{"id":6364,"date":"2018-08-14T15:26:09","date_gmt":"2018-08-14T20:26:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/onthinktanks.org\/?post_type=initiative&p=6364"},"modified":"2024-06-30T19:40:43","modified_gmt":"2024-07-01T00:40:43","slug":"monitoring-evaluation-and-learning","status":"publish","type":"initiative","link":"https:\/\/onthinktanks.org\/initiative\/school\/ott-school-library\/monitoring-evaluation-and-learning\/","title":{"rendered":"Monitoring, evaluation and learning"},"content":{"rendered":"

Webinars<\/h2>\n

Introductory\u00a0webinar. Monitoring, evaluation and learning for policy influence<\/h3>\n

Facilitated by Dena Lomofsky (On Think Tanks and Southern Hemisphere) and Tracey Philips (Southern Hemisphere)<\/p>\n

July 2018<\/p>\n

In this introductory webinar<\/a> Dena and Tracey provide an overview of the key issues and frameworks in MEL for policy influence. They specifically focus on its benefits, for example it can help organisations understand their own reputation and how their work is used, as well as on the drivers of MEL. The facilitators reflect on how the work that an organisation does influences policy and how context influences this process. They also discuss some of the challenges of monitoring and evaluating policy influence given that the processes are not linear, change is unpredictable, and attribution almost impossible to prove. They highlight that organisations with or without established MEL plans already do collect plenty information, but it is sometimes not easy to unravel what their impact is. In summary, they argue, and show that a good MEL system will help organisations capitalise and organise the information they collect, to learn: what their impact is, how best to carry out their work, and to let go of strategies that are not helping their objectives.<\/p>\n