2. Talent: Small teams with big ambitions<\/span><\/b><\/h3>\nMENA think tanks might be well-funded, but they aren\u2019t bloated. Most are boutique outfits with fewer than 20 staff members, some even with fewer than 10. These lean teams pack a punch\u2014<\/span>often comprising young, multilingual, and enthusiastic individuals. About half of all staff are under 35, bringing tech-savvy skills and fresh perspectives. Turnover is lower than expected; many staff members have permanent contracts, thanks to the core funding cushion. However, leaders worry about a\u00a0skills gap: seasoned policy experts and PhD-level researchers are in short supply locally, and the talent competition <\/span>is fierce. To combat this, nearly 80% of MENA think tanks\u00a0plan to hire in the next year, primarily to beef<\/span> up research and communications roles. This hiring spree outpaces the global trend, signalling optimism. The challenge will be training this influx of junior staff and providing them with career paths so they can become the next generation of think tank leaders. We\u2019re essentially witnessing a\u00a0capacity build-out in real-time<\/span>. With the right mentorship and training (and perhaps regional exchanges or fellowships), today\u2019s small teams could evolve into formidable knowledge hubs.<\/p>\n3. Measuring impact: Influence over income<\/span><\/b><\/h3>\nWhen asked how they know they\u2019re making a difference, MENA think tanks answered loud and clear: \u201cWe measure impact by the influence we have \u2013 media, public discourse, policy changes\u2014not by the size of our donor list.\u201d<\/i> Unlike some global institutes that equate impact with financial growth, only 8% of MENA respondents said funding diversity was a key impact metric. Instead, nearly 40% chose media presence and citations as the top indicator of impact. Indeed, many think tanks here have become go-to voices in the press on economic reform, climate policy, and more. Over 60% have had a direct hand in a public policy decision in recent years\u2014for example, providing research that shaped a new law or government strategy. They\u2019re not shy about it either; success for them is seeing their ideas come to life. That said, actually proving policy influence is tricky. MENA organisations are still figuring out how to document \u201cwe influenced X policy systematically.\u201d Most rely on anecdotes and the prestige of being consulted by officials. Going forward, we expect a bit more formalisation \u2013 perhaps publishing case studies of impact or tracking policy mentions. But make no mistake, these think tanks are punching above their weight. By focusing on communications and relationships, they have managed to insert themselves into meaningful conversations and decisions. Impact, for them, is less about glossy annual reports and more about real-world change.<\/p>\n