\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nThe name change from Overseas Development Institute to ODI Global was more than symbolic. It reflected a deliberate move away from a post-colonial worldview and research framing, towards one rooted in solidarity, equity, and global justice.<\/p>\n
Sara described the organisation\u2019s historical identity as no longer fit for purpose. The old name suggested that development happened \u201cover there\u201d and to<\/u><\/strong> people\/countries, reinforcing a paternalistic approach to the objective of international cooperation. By becoming ODI Global, the organisation embraced the universality of development challenges and acknowledged the need for new models of engagement.<\/p>\nThis shift was also internal. ODI Global examined its own structures and practices, confronting questions of power and privilege. Efforts were made to achieve gender parity in pay, lay the foundation for ethnic equity, and promote inclusive leadership practices. \u00a0A special effort was made to seed the internal staff-led demand for decolonising research and policy.\u00a0 \u201cWe\u2019re not where we need to be,\u201d she admitted, \u201cbut we\u2019ve set the course.\u201d<\/p>\n
Changing how research is done and shared<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nA central element of ODI Global\u2019s transformation was rethinking how the knowledge it generates with others is produced and shared. The number of annual publications was progressively reduced from 650 to under 300, a move aimed at focusing on work that changes narratives, not just fills libraries.<\/p>\n
Researchers were encouraged to move away from narrow, niche interests and instead contribute to broader systemic thinking. ODI Global began targeting key global processes such as: the G20, multilateral development bank (MDB) reforms, the design of the Loss and Damage Fund, supporting Small Islands Developing States (SIDS) in UNFCCC negotiations, supporting mutual aid efforts in humanitarian settings and the implementation of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA). It also took firm stances on politically sensitive issues, including speaking out early on the genocide in Gaza, \u00a0when too many others have been muted because of donor pressure or concerns.<\/p>\n
To increase the accessibility and reach of its work, ODI Global has ramped up the adoption of diverse content formats, podcasts, infographics, short videos and stronger presence on social media, recognising that lengthy reports are often ineffective for reaching key audiences. \u201cOur most downloaded publications are linked to subjects on university syllabuses,\u201d she noted, underlining the need to adapt to contemporary knowledge consumption.<\/p>\n
Building partnerships, not empires<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nA key tenet of ODI Global\u2019s new strategy has been a shift from organizational expansion to equitable co-creation. Rather than setting up offices abroad, beyond small bases in Brussels and Washington to influence global processes, ODI Global is focusing on building strong and equitable partnerships, including in Africa, and contributing its research and convening to the commitment to locally-led action. Speaking in South Africa last week, Sara said, \u201cCreating a base here in South Africa would be substituting for local voice and agency, which would be the last thing we want to do.\u201d. These partnerships are designed to decentralise knowledge production, asking the hard questions about who sets the research agenda, who owns the product and whose perspective leads the policy influencing activity.<\/p>\n
ODI has also embraced an incubation model, supporting new and innovative initiatives such as The New Humanitarian<\/em> and the Lago Collective<\/em>, which brings together migration, culture, and the arts, as well as the UN Charter Reform Coalition.<\/p>\nEmbracing messiness: Leadership lessons<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nSara did not shy away from describing the challenges of leading such a profound transformation. Internal resistance has been strong, particularly in response to the creation of ODI Global Advisory, a commercial arm designed to generate unrestricted income. For some staff, \u201ccommercial\u201d is synonymous with \u201cunethical\u201d. Balancing mission with funding needs has required careful navigation and honest communication.<\/p>\n
One of the most powerful insights shared was the need to \u201cbuild the plane while flying it.\u201d The tension between external ambition and internal cohesion is constant, and the emotional toll on staff is real. Yet, she insisted, transformation cannot be paralysed by dissent. Leaders must listen, create space for doubt, and be transparent about the messiness of change.<\/span><\/p>\nTowards a more flexible and responsive future<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nIn the closing Q&A, Sara introduced a funding model that offers a practical solution to the rigidity of traditional donor relationships. Dubbed the \u201cthree-thirds model\u201d, it proposes that one-third of funding be allocated at the organisation\u2019s discretion, one-third be co-designed with funders, and one-third be responsive to funder needs. This approach, she argued, allows for the flexibility required to remain relevant in fast-changing policy environments.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nConclusion: Purpose over comfort<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nODI Global\u2019s journey offers a bold and often uncomfortable example of what it takes to remain relevant as a think tank in today\u2019s world. Its transformation has not been linear or painless, and is by no means complete, but it has been anchored in a clear North Star: a commitment to equity, justice, and progressive change.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe are still learning, still adjusting, still evolving,\u201d Sara concluded. \u201cBut we are moving with purpose, with conviction, and with a renewed sense of what it means to be a radical force for change.\u201d<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\nThis summary has been generated with the support of AI tools.<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"In a powerful and deeply honest keynote, Sara Pantuliano recounted ODI Global\u2019s organisational transformation over the past five years, a process marked by bold decisions, painful trade-offs, and a renewed commitment to influence and purpose. Her reflection was more than a retrospective; it was a call to action for think tanks to adapt, evolve, and […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":30,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"tags":[210,233,275],"class_list":["post-2851425","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-business-model","tag-impact","tag-odi","article-types-case-study","article-types-opinion","article-types-video","series-ott-conference-2025-think-tanks-and-impact","theme-better-informed-policy","theme-communications","theme-funding-and-support-think-tanks","theme-governance-and-management","theme-understanding-think-tanks"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/onthinktanks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2851425","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/onthinktanks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/onthinktanks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/onthinktanks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/30"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/onthinktanks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2851425"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/onthinktanks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2851425\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2851672,"href":"https:\/\/onthinktanks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2851425\/revisions\/2851672"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/onthinktanks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2851425"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/onthinktanks.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2851425"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}