{"id":1638,"date":"2012-11-30T12:57:24","date_gmt":"2012-11-30T17:57:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/onthinktanks.org\/articles\/\/"},"modified":"2016-01-23T12:58:54","modified_gmt":"2016-01-23T17:58:54","slug":"capacity-building-for-think-tanks-advice-from-goran-buldioski","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/onthinktanks.org\/articles\/capacity-building-for-think-tanks-advice-from-goran-buldioski\/","title":{"rendered":"Capacity building for think tanks: advice from Goran Buldioski"},"content":{"rendered":"
Developing the capacity of think tanks in developing countries has emerged as a key concern and objective for many international development agencies. Efforts by the\u00a0Think Tank Initiative<\/a>, the\u00a0Open Society Foundations’ Think Tank Fund<\/a>, and now\u00a0AusAid’s Indonesian Knowledge Sector Initiative<\/a>\u00a0 all focus on developing the capacity of think tanks (among other actors. Goran Buldioski, from the Think Tank Fund, has published a list of very interesting recommendations based on his own experience:<\/p>\n You should go to the original blog,\u00a0Capacity building for think tanks<\/a>, but here are the highlights:<\/p>\n Goran offers some principles (copy-pasted excerpts) that are all worth paying attention to:<\/p>\n Overall, Goran places an increasing emphasis on real demand from the think tanks. This is very much in line with what I have written before on\u00a0capacity development<\/a>. Goran’s principles are important because they ensure that there is real buy-in from the think tanks rather than this being just an exercise driven by the funders and the consultants brought in to do the job.<\/p>\n Goran also recommends that capacity building is organised in a such a way that responds to different levels of organisational development. He is right. It makes no sense to put highly capable think tanks with those struggling with basic tasks. He recommends at least 2 tiers: basic and intermediate.<\/p>\n Equally, there are different forms of capacity building that could be taken into account. Not everything can be done with a single mechanism.<\/p>\n And the skills that are necessary for each think tank are also different. Again, this demands that each organisation is treated separately and allowed to demand the support they really need.<\/p>\n Getting to this point in the process is hard and can take some time but, as I have found, it is worth while. Not only is the work more interesting but the results of the support provided are far more significant and faster to achieve. The alternative, to plough through with external consultants and expensive interventions with little buy-in from the think tanks themselves, is far less effective.<\/p>\n Other relevant blog posts on capacity development can be found below:<\/p>\n Think Tank Initiative 2012 exchange: on building research capacity for \u2018young\u2019 think\u00a0tanks<\/a><\/p>\n Research communications support: why do donors, think tanks and consultants keep making the same\u00a0mistakes?<\/a><\/p>\n Capacity development: it is time to think about new ways of generating and sharing\u00a0knowledge<\/a>,<\/p>\n Developing research communication capacity: lessons from recent\u00a0experiences<\/a><\/p>\n\n
\n<\/span><\/li>\n